Archive for the “Business and Politics” Category

I loved this presentation by David Heinemeier Hansson of 37Signals. His topic? How to make money as an online software company.

His verdict? Charge for your product, but be careful whom you charge.

Chris Anderson elaborates on this theme:

37Signal’s secret is not to target consumers (who don’t

Source:The Open Road

Comments No Comments »

There’s a lot of great commentary out there on Google’s new Chrome browser, but the most insightful and incisive review I’ve seen thus far is Andrew Orlowski’s piece for The Register, wherein he calls out Chrome as a “Trojan Horse for…Google Gears.”

Today, Chrome is …

Source:The Open Road

Comments No Comments »

Just four days after Red Hat closed its second quarter, the company has announced the acquisition of Qumranet, an open-source virtualization company, positioning the open-source leader to shut many more successful quarters to come.

Red Hat acquired Qumranet for $107 million in cash, according to the company, which is surprising, …

Source:The Open Road

Comments No Comments »

While unit sales of mobile handsets are growing, as Ars Technica reports, the leading mobile operating system, Symbian, is on the decline. Perhaps it’s time for Symbian to accelerate its plans to open source the operating system?

Symbian’s dominance in the smartphone space has been taking a hit

Source:The Open Road

Comments No Comments »

There’s a lot of great commentary out there on Google’s new Chrome browser, but the most insightful and incisive review I’ve seen thus far is Andrew Orlowski’s piece for The Register, wherein he calls out Chrome as a “Trojan Horse for…Google Gears.”

Today, Chrome is …

Source:The Open Road

Comments No Comments »

Google has a new browser, called Chrome. That’s now old news. The Wall Street Journal suggests that it’s all about taking on Microsoft, and it’s probably right. Glyn Moody cogently argues that this is not about browsers at all, but rather about shifting the ground under everyone’s feet to the “Google operating system.” He’s probably right, too.

Chrome, however, lacks the very same thing that Android and every other Google product lacks, with the exception of its Search/Page Rank technology:

Community.

Mozilla Firefox has community in spades. Mozilla isn’t the one developing killer extensions to Firefox like Adblock Plus, Forecastfox, etc. The community does.

Even Microsoft has community in spades, though on the operating system side of its business, not its browser. Look at the ecosystem around Windows and Office: pretty impressive.

Google, however, seems to want to go it alone, whatever the collateral damage. It is telling that Chrome was a secret leaked and then announced to the world, rather than a transparent, community effort. Google did the same thing with Android, creating a closed-door community that left would-be Android developers riled.

Does it matter? Or is Google powerful enough to take on Microsoft by itself, community or no community?

Source:The Open Road

Comments No Comments »

For many companies, one million users is a large deal. For Microsoft, however, it’s a rounding error.

As reported by The Register, Microsoft announced that it has managed to attract one million users from “schools, businesses and home[s]” to its Office Live Workspace Beta experiment, which grants people …

Source:The Open Road

Comments No Comments »

Just four days after Red Hat closed its second quarter, the company has announced the acquisition of Qumranet, an open-source virtualization company, positioning the open-source leader to close many more successful quarters to come.

Red Hat acquired Qumranet for $107 million in cash, according to the company, which is surprising, …

Source:The Open Road

Comments No Comments »

What’s Google thinking? For those who didn’t catch Ina Fried’s perceptive review of Google Chrome’s terms of service Tuesday, ReadWriteWeb piles on Wednesday. In the terms of service, Google claims “a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, alter, translate, publish, publicly perform, …

Source:The Open Road

Comments No Comments »

Despite Google’s current extension of its partnership with Mozilla, it was just a matter of time before Google got too big for anyone else’s browser and decided to write its own. Or, rather, it was just a matter of time before Google decided to borrow the ideal of others’ open-source projects and extend them, as this is what Google generally does.

And so Google has done with its newly announced open-source Chrome browser:

What we really needed wasn’t just a browser, but also a modern platform for web pages and applications, and that’s what we set out to build.

So writes Sundar Pichai, vice president of product management at Google, and so plans Google. The difference this time is that Google will actually have to contribute code back, making its Chrome browser an experiment in community building, rather than merely community borrowing. It’s also an experiment in distributing software, not merely services, an area in which Google has not made much of a dent to date.

CNET News Poll

Browser wars, redux
What browser is in your future?

Google Chrome

World wide web Explorer

Firefox

Safari

Opera

Other

View results

Ars technica thinks Chrome sounds really innovative, what with its ability to segment the processes running in different browser tabs, among other things. Mozilla’s John Lilly welcomes the competition and continued partnership with Google, but can’t help but strike an ominous chord:

…[T]he parts where [Google and Mozilla are] different, with different missions, will continue to be separate. Mozilla’s mission is to keep the Web open and participatory….

Lilly doesn’t say it, but presumably he could have finished the sentence this way: “…And Google’s mission is to drive as much traffic and advertisements through its sites and services.” This is where I believe Chrome could both thrive and stagnate.

Source:The Open Road

Comments No Comments »

Close
E-mail It